When a 22s rule is broken in QC, what should be documented?

In the context of quality control (QC) in clinical laboratory settings, when a 22s rule is violated, it is essential to document both the corrective actions taken and the results of the quality control tests. This practice ensures that there is a clear record of the issue that arose, how it was addressed, and the results of the QC, which helps in identifying potential trends, understanding the causes of error, and preventing future occurrences.

Recording corrective actions is critical because it demonstrates compliance with laboratory protocols and regulatory standards, showing that the laboratory is actively managing its processes. Additionally, documenting the QC results alongside these actions provides a comprehensive understanding of the situation, allowing for better analysis and subsequent improvements in laboratory practices. This thorough documentation process is vital for maintaining the integrity of the laboratory's operations and ensuring accurate patient testing.

Other options would not provide the necessary level of detail or accountability required in a laboratory setting.